Thursday, June 21, 2018

Reflection: Assignment 3B


I definitely learned a lot from this lesson. While I think it went well overall, it’s hard to judge with a small sample size outside my target age group. The students were interested in the lesson, in part because I’m so passionate about middle grade and young adult books that I can’t help gushing about them. But also, they are independent reading books—the books students would choose to read on their own time even outside of school. So, in a way, examining plot, character, setting, and theme in this way felt almost like a book club: How did the author accomplish this seamless integration of all the elements? It’s like taking apart a puzzle. Many people don’t even realize novels are puzzles because the pieces fit so well together when done right. When an author is less accomplished, or when any of the narrative elements is a bit off, the edges show. As you can tell, I can talk about the craft of novel writing all day, but back to my point: The Lesson.

Students aren’t always as familiar with content as I assume them to be—that’s the first thing I learned. While setting high expectations and expecting the best out of students is great, that pre-assessment in crucial in gauging how much the students actually know about a topic going into it. Sometimes it’s less than I presume. Having the different colored markers was a nice indicator of what each individual student knew coming into the lesson. Again, that would be more difficult with a big group, but strategically colored sticky notes in carefully arranged groupings could help.
One thing I would change for next time would be to model the learning web graphic organizer that I’m asking them to complete as individual practice. It’s one thing to model the thinking processes, but showing the writing piece and giving an example of how I would make a connection web would be really helpful. I could use my original HOLES example and expand it to include the graphic organizer portion.

The assessments told me I need to give a clear model of the post-assessment. The pre and ongoing assessments went well and were very informative, but to have an exit ticket where I’m judging the success of a lesson and making plans for future interventions—that should have been introduced more explicitly. From a data standpoint, the assessment DID tell me how well most students understand the narrative elements as they exist separately from one another. Fewer students were able to make strong connections between the elements, especially when it came to proving a certain element needed to be handled that way in order for the story to make sense with the other pieces. As readers we like to believe authors have an unlimited playground of choices when it comes to how characters, plot, setting, and theme come together, but that’s not really the case. Yes, some elements surprise us, but it’s only a good surprise if it works, not a random 75-degree day in the middle of a story about surviving the frozen tundra. Not a squashed-in theme of corporate greed in a medieval love story.

Planning is key. This lesson could have gone way off course if I didn’t have a clear learning target and specified activities to guide us through the lesson. Teachers without a plan tend to either lecture too much or not enough—overcompensating by talking or leaving it all up to the students to figure out. Planning allows for a healthy balance.

As far as teaching, I learned I am on the right track with classroom and time management. Portions of the lesson took about as long as I anticipated, and students remained on task for the most part. The gradual release of responsibility and ongoing assessments also worked well.

Overall, I’m happy with the way this lesson turned out. I definitely recognized some areas where I can improve, as well as portions that may need to be adjusted for a younger and wider audience. But by taking the plunge and teaching a full ELA lesson—that’s where the real learning comes in. No matter how much you study or how many books you read, there’s no substitute for DOING. For being in the field applying these practices. There’s a reason being able to teach others something is the highest level of understanding: in order to teach it you have to know it on more than a surface level. You have to paraphrase and come at it from different directions. And I did. This fall, I’ll be directly applying this new understanding to a group of incoming 7th graders, so all the practice is valuable.

Friday, June 8, 2018

Week One Assignment 1A


Welcome to my teaching blog! I always enjoy self-reflection and figuring out how I can improve as both a teacher and a person. 

I am mostly ENFP according to both personality tests, which makes sense because I am primarily an extrovert and enjoy working closely with other people. The content area of English Language Arts truly matches well with my personality type. There are so many shades of gray and things that are open to interpretation in English, as opposed to a more rigid field like math, and I love helping students see multiple points of view.

Novels are a perfect example. Authors create characters and stories that don't have a practical application in the real world, but our lives are enriched by studying these stories. They teach us more about the adventure of being human and how to empathize with others by actually probing into another mindset while we read. 

Language arts also includes speaking and listening standards, so the ability to get up in front of a group and express oneself--whether through debate, presenting evidence, or performing readers' theater--is a life skill that will benefit students throughout their lives. 

Extroversion, intuition, feeling, and perceiving are traits that benefit any teacher, because I truly see the potential in all my students and can identify with them and the struggles they face. ENFPs understand the concept of individualized instruction--that one size never fits all when it comes to how students learn. In addition to teaching students the standards, I also care about their character education: making sure they make positive choices and are good friends to their peers and leave me with the life skills to be successful. 

Those are some of the intangible results of good teaching practices. Not every effect one has on a student will show up as a data point. But that doesn't mean those human connections aren't valuable. Students can learn facts almost anywhere these days. It's the person who cares for students and helps guide them as three-dimensional beings who will make the biggest difference in their lives. 

Colleges and employers want students and employees who are critical thinkers, who solve problems, and who communicate well with others. They don't want information-regurgitaters. So I constantly have to ask myself what value the assignments I'm giving will have for students going forward. Anything that is busy work or solely memory-based usually isn't the best way to teach or to learn. Students should be asking questions, making connections, and synthesizing what they learn to create something new. My teaching style of taking the material and improvising sections depending on student needs will serve them well. Nothing ever goes exactly according to plan, and the ability to be flexible and positive are great life skills.